106.
viruddha-rUpam ekasya sarvathA ghatate nahi / draSTR-bedho na
dRSTatvAt abhedas-satya eva hi //
Contrary states of existence
cannot hold for the same entity.[1]
We never see differences in the Seer. Therefore non-difference is the truth.
107.
draSTR-mAtraM bhaved-bhedaH tadA naiva hi siddhyati / sa bhedo
yady-asatyas-syAt vastu-bhedas-tu
nailyavat //
Distinction in the Seer
never occurs; while that distinction is false, the difference in the object
seen is otherwise, as the blueness in the sky.
108.
dRzya-dharmo na dRg-dharmaH
tasmAd-AtmA-dvayas-sadA /
aham-Atmeti gitoktyA sUryAntAZca ghaTAdayaH //
The Dharma of the Seer can
never be the dharma of the seen. Hence Atman is non-dual always. The gItA says:
I am the Atman, objects like the pot are dependent on external illumination.
109.
cetanenA-vabhAsyante dIpeneva
svatejasA / zuddheyaM cinmayI
dRSTiH jayaty-akhiladRSTiSu //
A lamp is self-illuminating.
So also is the Pure Light of Consciousness and it is also the illuminator of
all that is seen.
110.
dRSTir-eSA hi paramA
acaitya-cidahaM tviti / sattA sAmAnyatAtyacchA abhAvAtyanta-bhAvanAt //
That vision is supreme which
sees oneself as Absolute Consciousness. The ordinary state of apparent
existence does not sustain because it is not there in the Absolute. [2]
111.
turyA dRSTiH sthirA yA ca cit-prakAzAmza-kalpitA/
suSupta-sthairyam-AsAdya
tyakta-saMvedano’jaDaH //
The fourth vision is the
eternal one. It is the manifestation of the Light of Consciousness. It has the
constancy of the sleeping state but has transcended the stage of the knower and
the known. It is non-inert.
112.
ekarUpaM mahArUpaM arUpaM
yadvidurbudhAH/ cittatvam-eva yaccittaM bhidyate mAyayA punaH //
The Wise know it as of one
Form, as of the Great Form, and as of many Forms. The very awareness dissipates
the mind by mAyA.
113.
aviddha-dRgsvarUpo’haM
bhAvAbhAva-prabodhataH /
audasInyena yo draSTa IkSate svAvaSeSataH //
I am the One whose vision is
unimpaired. Thus being aware of both Existence and non-existence, he who sees
(the visible universe) with total indifference sees nothing but Himself.
114.
svAdhyAsA-panayaM kRtvA
svAnandAnubhavI hi dRk / sarvendriya-guNa-draSTA pratyagjyotiH parAtparaM //
The seer keeps away the
superimposition of the unreal and enjoys the bliss of the Self. He is the Inner
Light. He is the seer of all the gunas and senses. He is the transcendent.
115.
sarvArthA vai tadIkSeti[3]
tayoH prakRti-pUrSayoH / etad-Alocanenaiva
sarva-siddhir-bhavediti //
The Great
Seeing[4]
that took place of the purusha on the prakRti is full of
consequences. Meditation on this phenomenon will lead to Realisation.
116.
puruSas-saccidAnandaH vyAvahArika-dRSTitaH / bhedakopAdhi-virahe
aikyam-evAnubhUyate //
The individual is
Existence-Knowledge-Bliss. When he rids himself of the multiplicity of the
world and the adjuncts as also of the material phenomenal viewpoint, he enjoys
the Oneness of the Absolute.
117.
bhidyante pratibimbAzca
sopAdhaya itIritAH / antar-dRSTimatAM
loke zruti-yukti-sahAyataH //
The reflection of the
Absolute in the mind along with the adjuncts is annihilated thus [5]
-- by the Inner Vision accompanied by the ssupport of scriptures and logic.
118.
manISiNAM yo’nubhavaH sa eko hi sahasrapAt / pauruSeNaiva pUrSatvaM
zaktimat-tatvam-iSyate //
The experience of the wise
is that He only is the multi-faceted Ultimate. He is purusha because of
his prowess (pauruSaM). This is the ultimate Truth of His Power.
119.
zrutyA yaJAdayo JeyAH yuktiH zruty-anusAraNI / nAstikAnAM dRSTimAtraM asmAkaM
tritayaM tviti //
The rituals like yaJa’s
are to be understood from scriptures. Reason has to coordinate with scripture.
The atheists trust only their physical perception. For us, however, it is all
three – namely, perception, scripture and reason.
120.
zruti-yuktI samAlocya punar-dhyAnena samskRtAH/ saccid-Ananda AbhAsaH
iti bhAva-dvayaM tviha //
Scripture and Reason have
both to contribute and finally have to be synthesized again by Meditation.
There are two aspects here, namely, Existence-Knowledge-Bliss and its
reflection (in our minds).
Copyright Ó Mar.19, 2002 V. Krishnamurthy
Previous page Next page Titlepage
[1] What about quantum observables?
[2] This translation seems to be very weak.
[3] tadIkSA vai sarvArthA – is a sUtra of the work: siddhAnta-darzanaM –2.4.9. My father was seen by me reading this work siddhAnta-darzanaM almost all the time during his last few months. - VK
[4] Was this the Big-Bang ? VK
[5] cf. siddhAnta-darzanaM – 2.1.20 to 2.1.24